Snack Smarter for Clearer Skin

Looking at the label, this is a straightforward play: green peas, a bit of oil, and black pepper seasoning. The 9.7 score reflects that simplicity. You get a firm, earthy crunch from the peas, with a peppery kick that doesn't rely on a long list of additives. It's the kind of snack that survives a commute in a gym bag without turning into dust. The trade-off is the sodium; the seasoning is salt-forward, so you'll notice it if you eat the whole bag in one sitting. It's not a flavored chip, so don't expect a heavy cheese or BBQ punch. It's just a solid, savory crunch from a recognizable source.

This is your classic pretzel profile. The label shows enriched flour as the base, with palm oil and a bit of sugar and onion powder in the mix. The 9.3 score is solid for what it is. The texture is that familiar, crisp snap on the outside with a dense, chewy center. It's a reliable office snack that pairs easily with hummus or just a glass of water. The main trade-off is the ingredient quality; it's built on refined flour and palm oil, which some people prefer to limit. It's not a health food, but it's a predictable, salty, satisfying crunch when that specific craving hits.

The label doesn't lie: corn syrup and sugar are the first two ingredients, and the 60g of sugar per 100g confirms it. The 4.0 score is a reflection of that. The texture is soft and chewy, with a bright, artificial fruitiness that hits immediately. It's the kind of snack that can be useful for a quick energy spike before a workout, but the trade-off is the sugar crash that can follow. It's also sticky, which can be a mess in a hot car or a kid's backpack. This is purely a treat, not something you'd mistake for a nutritional snack. It's about the immediate, sugary satisfaction.

This is a classic lunchbox combo. The label shows a long list for the cookie sticks (enriched flour, sugar, oils) and a separate dip packed with sugar and palm oil. The 5.4 score puts it in the 'sometimes' category. The experience is all about the contrast: the crisp, chocolatey-ish stick against the super-sweet, thick cream. It's fun and nostalgic. The trade-off is the nutritional profile; it's high in sugar and relies on refined ingredients. It's also a single-serving pack, which can be convenient for portion control but generates more waste. It's a treat, not a snack.

This is essentially the same product as the other Handisnacks listed. The label shows the same two-part system: an enriched flour cookie stick and a sugar-heavy cream dip. The 5.4 score is consistent. The experience is identical: a crisp stick for dipping into a thick, sweet cream. The trade-off is the same, too—it's high in sugar and built on refined ingredients. If you're choosing between the two, it likely comes down to packaging or availability. It's a fun, occasional snack, but not one to rely on for nutrition. It's a dessert in a snack pack.