Head-to-Head Analysis

Šalša vs Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Šalša

Šalša

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor

Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
27 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
3.7g
Sugars
10g
0.5g
Fat
1g
1.5g
Protein
1g
0.5g
Salt
50g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Šalša and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Šalša is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Šalša takes the lead with only 3.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Šalša or Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?

Šalša appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Šalša vegan?

No, Šalša is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Šalša and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.