Head-to-Head Analysis

Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem vs Old Fashioned Hard Candies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem

Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Old Fashioned Hard Candies

Old Fashioned Hard Candies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
530 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
7.3g
Sugars
86.7g
41.5g
Fat
0g
9.8g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem and Old Fashioned Hard Candies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem is the more energy-dense option here, packing 130 more calories per 100g than Old Fashioned Hard Candies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem takes the lead with only 7.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Old Fashioned Hard Candies contains 86.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem offers a protein boost with 9.75g per 100g, outperforming Old Fashioned Hard Candies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem or Old Fashioned Hard Candies?

It depends on your goals. Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem has 530 calories, while Old Fashioned Hard Candies has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem vegan?

No, Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Şekersiz Bitter Çikolata Kaplı Badem and Old Fashioned Hard Candies?

There is a difference of 130 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.