1-2-3 Cookies vs Quaker grnola bar
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
1-2-3 Cookies
Quaker grnola bar
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing 1-2-3 Cookies and Quaker grnola bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
1-2-3 Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 89 more calories per 100g than Quaker grnola bar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, 1-2-3 Cookies takes the lead with only 32.1428571428572g of sugar per 100g, whereas Quaker grnola bar contains 33.3333333333333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? 1-2-3 Cookies offers a protein boost with 7.14285714285715g per 100g, outperforming Quaker grnola bar in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: 1-2-3 Cookies or Quaker grnola bar?
It depends on your goals. 1-2-3 Cookies has 464.285714285714 calories, while Quaker grnola bar has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is 1-2-3 Cookies vegan?
No, 1-2-3 Cookies is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between 1-2-3 Cookies and Quaker grnola bar?
There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.
