Head-to-Head Analysis

2% Milk vs Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 2% Milk

2% Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa

Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
54.2 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
4.6g
Sugars
0g
2.1g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
6.3g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 2% Milk and Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 2% Milk is the clear winner. With 321 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 2% Milk contains significantly more sugar (4.58g) compared to the milder Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 2% Milk or Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa?

It depends on your goals. 2% Milk has 54.2 calories, while Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 2% Milk vegan?

No, 2% Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 2% Milk and Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa?

There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.