Head-to-Head Analysis

2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk vs Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk

2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese

Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
50 kcal
Energy
384.6 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
0g
2.1g
Fat
30.8g
3.3g
Protein
23.1g
0.1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk and Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk is the clear winner. With 335 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk contains significantly more sugar (5.42g) compared to the milder Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese (0.01g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk or Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese?

It depends on your goals. 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk has 50 calories, while Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese has 384.62 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk vegan?

No, 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 2% Milkfat Reducedfat Grade A Milk and Finely Shredded Natural Marble Jack Cheese?

There is a difference of 335 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.