Head-to-Head Analysis

3 Bean Chili vs Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 3 Bean Chili

3 Bean Chili

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original

Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
314.3 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
11.4g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
9g
20g
Protein
2g
4.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 3 Bean Chili and Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

3 Bean Chili is the more energy-dense option here, packing 164 more calories per 100g than Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 3 Bean Chili contains significantly more sugar (11.428571428571g) compared to the milder Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? 3 Bean Chili offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 3 Bean Chili or Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original?

It depends on your goals. 3 Bean Chili has 314.28571428571 calories, while Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 3 Bean Chili vegan?

No, 3 Bean Chili is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 3 Bean Chili and Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Sea Salt Original?

There is a difference of 164 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.