Head-to-Head Analysis

365 everyday value, microwave popcorn vs Picon california sweet roll

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn

365 everyday value, microwave popcorn

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Picon california sweet roll

Picon california sweet roll

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
364 kcal
Energy
352 kcal
3g
Sugars
16.9g
4.6g
Fat
14.1g
12.1g
Protein
7g
0.2g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn and Picon california sweet roll side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

365 everyday value, microwave popcorn is the more energy-dense option here, packing 12 more calories per 100g than Picon california sweet roll. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn takes the lead with only 3.03g of sugar per 100g, whereas Picon california sweet roll contains 16.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn offers a protein boost with 12.12g per 100g, outperforming Picon california sweet roll in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn or Picon california sweet roll?

It depends on your goals. 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn has 364 calories, while Picon california sweet roll has 352 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn vegan?

No, 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 365 everyday value, microwave popcorn and Picon california sweet roll?

There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.