Head-to-Head Analysis

365 everyday value, red kidney beans vs Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of 365 everyday value, red kidney beans

365 everyday value, red kidney beans

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
7.1g
0g
Fat
32.1g
22.2g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 365 everyday value, red kidney beans and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 365 everyday value, red kidney beans is the clear winner. With 167 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, 365 everyday value, red kidney beans takes the lead with only 2.22g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? 365 everyday value, red kidney beans offers a protein boost with 22.22g per 100g, outperforming Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 365 everyday value, red kidney beans or Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

365 everyday value, red kidney beans appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is 365 everyday value, red kidney beans vegan?

No, 365 everyday value, red kidney beans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 365 everyday value, red kidney beans and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.