Head-to-Head Analysis

40% Bran Flakes vs Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 40% Bran Flakes

40% Bran Flakes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt

Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321.4 kcal
Energy
714.3 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
3.6g
3.6g
Fat
75g
10.7g
Protein
7.1g
2.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 40% Bran Flakes and Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 40% Bran Flakes is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 40% Bran Flakes contains significantly more sugar (17.857142857143g) compared to the milder Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? 40% Bran Flakes offers a protein boost with 10.714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 40% Bran Flakes or Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. 40% Bran Flakes has 321.42857142857 calories, while Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt has 714.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 40% Bran Flakes vegan?

No, 40% Bran Flakes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 40% Bran Flakes and Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.