Head-to-Head Analysis

647 vs Classic Original Potato Crisps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 647

647

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Original Potato Crisps

Classic Original Potato Crisps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
489 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
24.4g
10.7g
Protein
4.4g
1.1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 647 and Classic Original Potato Crisps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 647 is the clear winner. With 346 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 647 contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Classic Original Potato Crisps (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Original Potato Crisps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? 647 offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Classic Original Potato Crisps in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 647 or Classic Original Potato Crisps?

It depends on your goals. 647 has 143 calories, while Classic Original Potato Crisps has 489 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 647 vegan?

No, 647 is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 647 and Classic Original Potato Crisps?

There is a difference of 346 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.