Head-to-Head Analysis

647 vs Thai Jasmine Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 647

647

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thai Jasmine Rice

Thai Jasmine Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
360 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
8g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 647 and Thai Jasmine Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 647 is the clear winner. With 217 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 647 contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Thai Jasmine Rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thai Jasmine Rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? 647 offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Thai Jasmine Rice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 647 or Thai Jasmine Rice?

It depends on your goals. 647 has 143 calories, while Thai Jasmine Rice has 360 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 647 vegan?

No, 647 is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 647 and Thai Jasmine Rice?

There is a difference of 217 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.