Head-to-Head Analysis

85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar vs Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar

85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour

Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
633 kcal
Energy
359 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
51.3g
53.3g
Fat
3.9g
10g
Protein
2.6g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar and Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 274 more calories per 100g than Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar takes the lead with only 13.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour contains 51.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar or Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour?

It depends on your goals. 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar has 633 calories, while Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour has 359 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar vegan?

No, 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate Bar and Twizzlers Filled Twists Sweet & Sour?

There is a difference of 274 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.