Head-to-Head Analysis

95/5 Ground Chicken vs Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of 95/5 Ground Chicken

95/5 Ground Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak

Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
129.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.9g
5.4g
Fat
1.8g
22.3g
Protein
16.5g
0.1g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 95/5 Ground Chicken and Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

95/5 Ground Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 14 more calories per 100g than Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, 95/5 Ground Chicken takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak contains 5.8823529411765g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? 95/5 Ground Chicken offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 95/5 Ground Chicken or Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak?

It depends on your goals. 95/5 Ground Chicken has 143 calories, while Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak has 129.41176470588 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 95/5 Ground Chicken vegan?

No, 95/5 Ground Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 95/5 Ground Chicken and Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak?

There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.