96/4 Ground beef vs Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
96/4 Ground beef
Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing 96/4 Ground beef and Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, 96/4 Ground beef is the clear winner. With 236 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, 96/4 Ground beef takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry contains 35.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? 96/4 Ground beef offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: 96/4 Ground beef or Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry?
96/4 Ground beef appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is 96/4 Ground beef vegan?
No, 96/4 Ground beef is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between 96/4 Ground beef and Kellog's Nutrigrain Blueberry?
There is a difference of 236 calories per 100g between the two products.
