Head-to-Head Analysis

Acai & Blueberry Flavors vs Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Acai & Blueberry Flavors

Acai & Blueberry Flavors

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
60g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Acai & Blueberry Flavors and Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Acai & Blueberry Flavors is the more energy-dense option here, packing 233 more calories per 100g than Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Acai & Blueberry Flavors contains significantly more sugar (60g) compared to the milder Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Acai & Blueberry Flavors offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Acai & Blueberry Flavors or Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free?

It depends on your goals. Acai & Blueberry Flavors has 433 calories, while Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Acai & Blueberry Flavors vegan?

No, Acai & Blueberry Flavors is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Acai & Blueberry Flavors and Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free?

There is a difference of 233 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.