Head-to-Head Analysis

Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso vs Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso

Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133.3 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
0g
Sugars
53.3g
13.3g
Fat
20g
6g
Protein
3.3g
2.3g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso and Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso is the clear winner. With 334 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites contains 53.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso or Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites?

Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso vegan?

No, Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Aceitunas Verdes sin hueso and Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites?

There is a difference of 334 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.