Head-to-Head Analysis

Alaska grains baking company 100% whole vs Organic oat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Alaska grains baking company 100% whole

Alaska grains baking company 100% whole

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic oat milk

Organic oat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
54.2 kcal
7.5g
Sugars
3.3g
2.5g
Fat
2.5g
10g
Protein
0.4g
1.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Alaska grains baking company 100% whole and Organic oat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Alaska grains baking company 100% whole is the more energy-dense option here, packing 196 more calories per 100g than Organic oat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Alaska grains baking company 100% whole contains significantly more sugar (7.5g) compared to the milder Organic oat milk (3.3333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic oat milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Alaska grains baking company 100% whole offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Organic oat milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Alaska grains baking company 100% whole or Organic oat milk?

It depends on your goals. Alaska grains baking company 100% whole has 250 calories, while Organic oat milk has 54.1667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Alaska grains baking company 100% whole vegan?

No, Alaska grains baking company 100% whole is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Alaska grains baking company 100% whole and Organic oat milk?

There is a difference of 196 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.