Head-to-Head Analysis

Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water vs Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water

Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water

Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
115 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.4g
Fat
1.3g
21.4g
Protein
25.7g
0.6g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water and Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water is the clear winner. With 15 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water or Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water?

It depends on your goals. Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water has 100 calories, while Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water vegan?

No, Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Alaskan Pink Salmon in Spring Water and Solid White Tuna Albacore in Water?

There is a difference of 15 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.