Head-to-Head Analysis

Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild vs Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild

Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy

Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
134 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
0g
Sugars
66.7g
4.5g
Fat
0g
22.3g
Protein
6.7g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild and Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild is the clear winner. With 199 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy contains 66.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild or Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy?

Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild vegan?

No, Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Wild and Hairbo gummy peaches--individually wrapped gummy candy?

There is a difference of 199 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.