ALBACORE WILD TUNA vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
ALBACORE WILD TUNA
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing ALBACORE WILD TUNA and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
ALBACORE WILD TUNA is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? ALBACORE WILD TUNA offers a protein boost with 23.2g per 100g, outperforming Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: ALBACORE WILD TUNA or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets?
It depends on your goals. ALBACORE WILD TUNA has 127 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets has 94 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is ALBACORE WILD TUNA vegan?
No, ALBACORE WILD TUNA is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between ALBACORE WILD TUNA and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets?
There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.
