Head-to-Head Analysis

Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla vs Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla

Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips

Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
4.2 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
32.1g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla and Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla is the clear winner. With 496 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla contains significantly more sugar (1.0570824524313g) compared to the milder Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla or Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla has 4.2283298097252 calories, while Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla vegan?

No, Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Alive adaptogenic tea - Matcha Vanilla and Jack's Special Seasoned Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 496 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.