Head-to-Head Analysis

Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds vs Original Pulparindo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds

Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Pulparindo

Original Pulparindo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
11.7g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds and Original Pulparindo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 433 more calories per 100g than Original Pulparindo. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Original Pulparindo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds or Original Pulparindo?

It depends on your goals. Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds has 433 calories, while Original Pulparindo has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds vegan?

No, Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almond Nut-Thins Cheddar Cheese Rice Cracker Snacks with Almonds and Original Pulparindo?

There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.