Head-to-Head Analysis

ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH vs Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH

ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix

Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
1g
10g
Fat
14g
10g
Protein
6g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH and Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH is the more energy-dense option here, packing 263 more calories per 100g than Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix (1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH or Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix?

It depends on your goals. ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH has 433 calories, while Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH vegan?

No, ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ALMOND NUT-THINS COUNTRY RANCH and Organic Paleo Go Snack Mix?

There is a difference of 263 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.