Head-to-Head Analysis

Almond Snapstix vs Original Ruffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Almond Snapstix

Almond Snapstix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Ruffles

Original Ruffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
371 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
25.7g
Sugars
1.8g
20g
Fat
35.7g
5.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almond Snapstix and Original Ruffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Almond Snapstix is the clear winner. With 200 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Almond Snapstix contains significantly more sugar (25.7g) compared to the milder Original Ruffles (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Ruffles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almond Snapstix or Original Ruffles?

It depends on your goals. Almond Snapstix has 371 calories, while Original Ruffles has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almond Snapstix vegan?

No, Almond Snapstix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almond Snapstix and Original Ruffles?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.