Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix vs Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix
Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix and Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 533 more calories per 100g than Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix or Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt?
It depends on your goals. Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix has 533 calories, while Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix vegan?
No, Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Almonds, Chocolate & Cashews Trek Mix and Grinder Himalayan Pink Salt?
There is a difference of 533 calories per 100g between the two products.
