Head-to-Head Analysis

Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix vs Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix

Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts

Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
306 kcal
30g
Sugars
10.2g
33.3g
Fat
173g
13.3g
Protein
91.8g
0.1g
Salt
11g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix and Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix contains significantly more sugar (30g) compared to the milder Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts (10.2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix or Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts?

It depends on your goals. Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix has 500 calories, while Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts has 306 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix vegan?

No, Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almonds, Cranberries & Cashews Trek Mix and Roasted & Salted Virginia Peanuts?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.