Head-to-Head Analysis

Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate vs Original Apple Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate

Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Apple Chips

Original Apple Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
586 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
37.9g
Sugars
39.3g
37.9g
Fat
21.4g
10.3g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate and Original Apple Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 86 more calories per 100g than Original Apple Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate takes the lead with only 37.93g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Apple Chips contains 39.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate offers a protein boost with 10.34g per 100g, outperforming Original Apple Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate or Original Apple Chips?

It depends on your goals. Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate has 586 calories, while Original Apple Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate vegan?

No, Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almonds & sea salt organic dark chocolate and Original Apple Chips?

There is a difference of 86 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.