Head-to-Head Analysis

Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate vs Fall Festival Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate

Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fall Festival Mix

Fall Festival Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533.3 kcal
Energy
364 kcal
36.7g
Sugars
75g
40g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate and Fall Festival Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 169 more calories per 100g than Fall Festival Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate takes the lead with only 36.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fall Festival Mix contains 75g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Fall Festival Mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate or Fall Festival Mix?

It depends on your goals. Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate has 533.33 calories, while Fall Festival Mix has 364 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almonds, Toffee & Sea Salt In Dark Chocolate and Fall Festival Mix?

There is a difference of 169 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.