Aloha Chicken vs Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Aloha Chicken
Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Aloha Chicken and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Aloha Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 10 more calories per 100g than Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Aloha Chicken takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Aloha Chicken offers a protein boost with 11.6g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Aloha Chicken or Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?
It depends on your goals. Aloha Chicken has 110 calories, while Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Aloha Chicken vegan?
No, Aloha Chicken is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Aloha Chicken and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?
There is a difference of 10 calories per 100g between the two products.
