Head-to-Head Analysis

Amarettini vs Pork Rinds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Amarettini

Amarettini

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pork Rinds

Pork Rinds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
60g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
8g
10g
Protein
15g
0g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Amarettini and Pork Rinds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Amarettini is the more energy-dense option here, packing 327 more calories per 100g than Pork Rinds. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Amarettini contains significantly more sugar (60g) compared to the milder Pork Rinds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pork Rinds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Amarettini or Pork Rinds?

It depends on your goals. Amarettini has 467 calories, while Pork Rinds has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Amarettini vegan?

No, Amarettini is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Amarettini and Pork Rinds?

There is a difference of 327 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.