Head-to-Head Analysis

American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage vs Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage

American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
462 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
3.9g
Sugars
7.1g
42.3g
Fat
32.1g
19.2g
Protein
7.1g
2.9g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage is the clear winner. With 38 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage takes the lead with only 3.85g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage offers a protein boost with 19.2g per 100g, outperforming Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage or Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage vegan?

No, American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between American Wagyu Beef Smoked Sausage and Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.