Head-to-Head Analysis

Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk vs Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk

Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc

Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
75 kcal
Energy
294 kcal
5g
Sugars
0g
4.6g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk and Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk is the clear winner. With 219 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk or Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc?

It depends on your goals. Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk has 75 calories, while Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc has 294 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk vegan?

No, Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Amul Shakti 4.5% Fat Whole Milk and Trident gum mint bliss 1x18 pc?

There is a difference of 219 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.