Head-to-Head Analysis

Angel hair, enriched macaroni product vs Caramel macchiato creamer

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Angel hair, enriched macaroni product

Angel hair, enriched macaroni product

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Caramel macchiato creamer

Caramel macchiato creamer

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
230.8 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
38.5g
1.8g
Fat
7.7g
12.5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Angel hair, enriched macaroni product and Caramel macchiato creamer side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Angel hair, enriched macaroni product is the more energy-dense option here, packing 126 more calories per 100g than Caramel macchiato creamer. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Angel hair, enriched macaroni product takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Caramel macchiato creamer contains 38.46g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Angel hair, enriched macaroni product offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Caramel macchiato creamer in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Angel hair, enriched macaroni product or Caramel macchiato creamer?

It depends on your goals. Angel hair, enriched macaroni product has 357 calories, while Caramel macchiato creamer has 230.77 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Angel hair, enriched macaroni product vegan?

No, Angel hair, enriched macaroni product is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Angel hair, enriched macaroni product and Caramel macchiato creamer?

There is a difference of 126 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.