Head-to-Head Analysis

Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato vs No Frills Dills Pickles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato

Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of No Frills Dills Pickles

No Frills Dills Pickles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
49.6 kcal
Energy
17.9 kcal
3.7g
Sugars
0g
0.2g
Fat
0g
1.7g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato and No Frills Dills Pickles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato is the more energy-dense option here, packing 32 more calories per 100g than No Frills Dills Pickles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato contains significantly more sugar (3.72g) compared to the milder No Frills Dills Pickles (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No Frills Dills Pickles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato or No Frills Dills Pickles?

It depends on your goals. Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato has 49.59 calories, while No Frills Dills Pickles has 17.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato vegan?

No, Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Annies organic all stars canned pasta in tomato and No Frills Dills Pickles?

There is a difference of 32 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.