Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar vs Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar

Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
54.3g
Sugars
7.1g
0g
Fat
17.9g
2.9g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar and Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar is the clear winner. With 143 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar contains significantly more sugar (54.3g) compared to the milder Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks (7.1429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar offers a protein boost with 2.86g per 100g, outperforming Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar or Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks?

It depends on your goals. Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar has 286 calories, while Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks has 428.5714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar vegan?

No, Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple + Blueberry Fruit Bar and Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.