Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon vs Vienna Sausage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon

Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Vienna Sausage

Vienna Sausage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
115 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
3.5g
Fat
10g
17.6g
Protein
10g
1.4g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon and Vienna Sausage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon is the clear winner. With 18 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon contains significantly more sugar (3.53g) compared to the milder Vienna Sausage (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Vienna Sausage is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon offers a protein boost with 17.6g per 100g, outperforming Vienna Sausage in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon or Vienna Sausage?

It depends on your goals. Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon has 115 calories, while Vienna Sausage has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon vegan?

No, Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple bourbon pork tenderloin, apple bourbon and Vienna Sausage?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.