Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple Butter vs Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple Butter

Apple Butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored

Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
235 kcal
Energy
359 kcal
52.9g
Sugars
38.5g
0g
Fat
9g
0g
Protein
5.1g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple Butter and Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple Butter is the clear winner. With 124 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple Butter contains significantly more sugar (52.9g) compared to the milder Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored (38.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple Butter or Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored?

It depends on your goals. Apple Butter has 235 calories, while Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored has 359 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple Butter vegan?

No, Apple Butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple Butter and Sunbelt Bakery Soft Baked Bars Sweet Fruit Filling Strawberry Flavored?

There is a difference of 124 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.