Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches vs Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches

Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips

Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
66.7 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
12.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
7g
0g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches and Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches contains significantly more sugar (12.2g) compared to the milder Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches or Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches has 66.7 calories, while Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches vegan?

No, Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple Cinnamon Fruit Purée Pouches and Blue Chips No Salt Added Corn Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.