Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps vs Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps

Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer

Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
26.7g
1.8g
Fat
6.7g
3.6g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps and Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 193 more calories per 100g than Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer (26.666666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps or Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer?

It depends on your goals. Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps has 393 calories, while Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps vegan?

No, Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple Cinnamon Rice Crisps and Sweet & Creamy Coconut Creamer?

There is a difference of 193 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.