Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar vs Crunchy Taco Shells

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar

Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crunchy Taco Shells

Crunchy Taco Shells

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
469 kcal
5.3g
Sugars
0g
12.3g
Fat
21.9g
21.1g
Protein
6.3g
0.3g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar and Crunchy Taco Shells side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar is the clear winner. With 136 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar contains significantly more sugar (5.26315789473684g) compared to the milder Crunchy Taco Shells (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crunchy Taco Shells is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar offers a protein boost with 21.0526315789474g per 100g, outperforming Crunchy Taco Shells in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar or Crunchy Taco Shells?

It depends on your goals. Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar has 333.333333333333 calories, while Crunchy Taco Shells has 469 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar vegan?

No, Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple Cinnamon Soft Baked Protein Bar and Crunchy Taco Shells?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.