Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages vs Premium ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages

Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Premium ham

Premium ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
178.6 kcal
9.1g
Sugars
1.8g
8g
Fat
12.5g
22.7g
Protein
16.1g
2.1g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages and Premium ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages is the more energy-dense option here, packing 71 more calories per 100g than Premium ham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages contains significantly more sugar (9.09g) compared to the milder Premium ham (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Premium ham is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages offers a protein boost with 22.7g per 100g, outperforming Premium ham in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages or Premium ham?

It depends on your goals. Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages has 250 calories, while Premium ham has 178.57 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages vegan?

No, Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple & Maple Plant-Based Breakfast Sausages and Premium ham?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.