Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vs mustard Potato Salad

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of mustard Potato Salad

mustard Potato Salad

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
128.6 kcal
10.9g
Sugars
3.6g
9g
Fat
5g
5.8g
Protein
2.1g
1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and mustard Potato Salad side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 31 more calories per 100g than mustard Potato Salad. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken contains significantly more sugar (10.9g) compared to the milder mustard Potato Salad (3.57142857142857g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, mustard Potato Salad is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken offers a protein boost with 5.77g per 100g, outperforming mustard Potato Salad in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken or mustard Potato Salad?

It depends on your goals. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken has 160 calories, while mustard Potato Salad has 128.571428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vegan?

No, Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and mustard Potato Salad?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.