Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vs Pitted Medley Greek Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted Medley Greek Olives

Pitted Medley Greek Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
233.3 kcal
10.9g
Sugars
0g
9g
Fat
23.3g
5.8g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
3.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and Pitted Medley Greek Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken contains significantly more sugar (10.9g) compared to the milder Pitted Medley Greek Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted Medley Greek Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken offers a protein boost with 5.77g per 100g, outperforming Pitted Medley Greek Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken or Pitted Medley Greek Olives?

It depends on your goals. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken has 160 calories, while Pitted Medley Greek Olives has 233.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vegan?

No, Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and Pitted Medley Greek Olives?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.