Head-to-Head Analysis

Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin vs Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin

Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic

Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
203 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
12.3g
Fat
15g
18.5g
Protein
10g
1.1g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin and Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin is the clear winner. With 230 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin contains significantly more sugar (1.76g) compared to the milder Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin or Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic?

It depends on your goals. Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin has 203 calories, while Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin vegan?

No, Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Applewood Smoked Bacon Pork Loin and Thin Crisps Parmesan Garlic?

There is a difference of 230 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.