Head-to-Head Analysis

Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham vs Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham

Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries

Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
119 kcal
Energy
256 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
4.2g
Fat
14.4g
19g
Protein
15.6g
2.2g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham and Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham is the clear winner. With 137 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.19g) compared to the milder Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham offers a protein boost with 19g per 100g, outperforming Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham or Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries?

It depends on your goals. Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham has 119 calories, while Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries has 256 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham vegan?

No, Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham and Any'tizers homestyle chicken fries?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.