Head-to-Head Analysis

Apricot Premium Fruit Spread vs Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apricot Premium Fruit Spread

Apricot Premium Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
166.7 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
38.9g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
28g
0g
Protein
4g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apricot Premium Fruit Spread and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apricot Premium Fruit Spread is the clear winner. With 353 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apricot Premium Fruit Spread contains significantly more sugar (38.888888888889g) compared to the milder Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apricot Premium Fruit Spread or Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

It depends on your goals. Apricot Premium Fruit Spread has 166.66666666667 calories, while Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips has 520 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apricot Premium Fruit Spread vegan?

No, Apricot Premium Fruit Spread is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apricot Premium Fruit Spread and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

There is a difference of 353 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.