Head-to-Head Analysis

Asiago New York Style Bagels vs Certified Organic Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Asiago New York Style Bagels

Asiago New York Style Bagels

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Certified Organic Tortilla Chips

Certified Organic Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
269 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
5.6g
Sugars
0g
2.8g
Fat
14.3g
10.2g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Asiago New York Style Bagels and Certified Organic Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Asiago New York Style Bagels is the clear winner. With 160 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Asiago New York Style Bagels contains significantly more sugar (5.56g) compared to the milder Certified Organic Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Certified Organic Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Asiago New York Style Bagels offers a protein boost with 10.2g per 100g, outperforming Certified Organic Tortilla Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Asiago New York Style Bagels or Certified Organic Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Asiago New York Style Bagels has 269 calories, while Certified Organic Tortilla Chips has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Asiago New York Style Bagels vegan?

No, Asiago New York Style Bagels is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Asiago New York Style Bagels and Certified Organic Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.