Head-to-Head Analysis

Asiago New York Style Bagels vs ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Asiago New York Style Bagels

Asiago New York Style Bagels

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
269 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
5.6g
Sugars
0g
2.8g
Fat
0g
10.2g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Asiago New York Style Bagels and ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Asiago New York Style Bagels is the clear winner. With 88 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Asiago New York Style Bagels contains significantly more sugar (5.56g) compared to the milder ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Asiago New York Style Bagels offers a protein boost with 10.2g per 100g, outperforming ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Asiago New York Style Bagels or ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free?

It depends on your goals. Asiago New York Style Bagels has 269 calories, while ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Asiago New York Style Bagels vegan?

No, Asiago New York Style Bagels is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Asiago New York Style Bagels and ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free?

There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.