Head-to-Head Analysis

Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet vs Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet

Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn

Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
176 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
40g
10.6g
Fat
26.7g
16.8g
Protein
3.3g
1.5g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet and Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet is the clear winner. With 324 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet offers a protein boost with 16.8g per 100g, outperforming Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet or Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn?

Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet vegan?

No, Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Asiago Peppercorn Pork Loin Filet and Chocolatey Drizzled Strawberry Kettle Popcorn?

There is a difference of 324 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.